TL;DR Summary of EU Court Rules Against Digital Services Act Supervisory Fee for Meta and TikTok
Optimixed’s Overview: EU Court Decision Prompts Revision of Digital Services Act Fee Structure
Background on the EU Digital Services Act Supervisory Fee
The EU Commission introduced a supervisory fee aimed at large tech platforms to finance enforcement of the Digital Services Act (DSA). This fee was set at 0.05% of a platform’s annual worldwide net income, with the rationale that platforms generating more revenue should contribute more to regulatory oversight costs.
Issues with the Fee Calculation Methodology
- The fee was linked to revenue rather than the actual regulatory workload each platform generates.
- Platforms with high user numbers but financial losses could avoid paying the fee despite generating significant supervisory demands.
- The methodology for calculating active users, a key input, was adopted incorrectly within the EU regulatory framework, violating procedural rules.
The Court’s Ruling and Its Implications
The Luxembourg-based General Court ruled that the European Commission’s approach to determining the supervisory fee was flawed because the methodology should have been established through a delegated act rather than implementing decisions. This procedural misstep invalidated the fee’s calculation for 2023.
As a result, the EU Commission must develop a new mechanism for calculating supervisory fees that better aligns costs with actual regulatory workload and complies with the DSA’s procedural requirements.
Significance for Social Media Platforms and Regulatory Landscape
- This decision represents a minor but important win for Meta and TikTok amid extensive EU regulatory pressures and multi-billion dollar fines.
- Meta has actively sought support from the U.S. government to push back against EU regulations viewed as disproportionately targeting its business.
- The ruling highlights ongoing tensions between major social platforms and EU authorities over fair and enforceable regulatory frameworks.